Real Numbers
From counting mangoes to Euclid's algorithm, irrational numbers, and decimal expansions, this page gives you the full Class 10 Real Numbers chapter in one place with examples, proofs, and practice.
Natural Numbers
The counting numbers - the oldest mathematics on Earth
Answer: 7, 45, and 1000 only.
Whole Numbers
Adding zero changes the story
Answer: Whole Number only.
Integers
Going below zero - temperature, depth, and debt
Answer: -10, -7, -2, 0, 3, 5
Rational Numbers
The sharing numbers - fractions, ratios, and parts
Check which numbers are rational
- is rational.
- is rational.
- is rational.
- is not rational.
Irrational Numbers
Infinite decimals with no repeating pattern
- is rational. It is only an approximation of .
- is rational because 4 is a perfect square.
- is irrational because 5 is not a perfect square.
Real Numbers
The complete family of numbers on the number line
Answer: Every integer is real, but not every real number is an integer.
What 'Divides' Actually Means
The precise meaning of divisibility
State whether each is true or false
- is true because .
- is false because the division leaves a remainder.
- is false because division by zero is not defined.
- is true because .
Euclid's Division Lemma
The universal packing rule of division
Express 347 in the form 11q + r
The Golden Rule of Remainder
Why the remainder must always be smaller than the divisor
Answer: Only the middle one is valid.
Why Learn This?
How Euclid's Lemma helps classify integers
Why every positive integer is either 2q or 2q+1
Euclid's Division Algorithm
Finding the HCF step by step
Show the full HCF chain for HCF(4052, 12576)
Since 12576 is larger, start there.
So the HCF is 4.
Applications of HCF
Largest equal grouping problems
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
Every composite number has unique prime-factor DNA
Can 4^n ever end with 0?
HCF and LCM Relationship
The shortcut formula for two numbers
Find HCF and LCM of 90 and 144
Proving Irrationality
The contradiction method
How to prove expressions like 3 + 2√5 are irrational
Show the contradiction proof for √3
Assume where and are co-prime.
Squaring gives . So 3 divides , hence 3 divides .
Let . Then , so and therefore .
This means 3 divides as well, contradicting the fact that and are co-prime.
Therefore, is irrational.
Decimal Expansions of Rational Numbers
When decimals terminate and when they repeat
Complete Chapter Summary
| # | Concept | Key Fact / Formula |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natural Numbers | N = {1, 2, 3, ...} |
| 2 | Whole Numbers | W = {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} |
| 3 | Integers | Z includes negatives, zero, positives |
| 4 | Rational Numbers | p/q with q != 0 |
| 5 | Irrational Numbers | Non-terminating, non-repeating decimals |
| 6 | Real Numbers | N subset W subset Z subset Q subset R |
| 7 | Divisibility | a divides b if b = a x c |
| 8 | Euclid's Lemma | a = bq + r, 0 <= r < b |
| 11 | Euclid's Algorithm | Last non-zero remainder is the HCF |
| 13 | Fundamental Theorem | Unique prime factorisation |
| 14 | HCF x LCM | HCF(a,b) x LCM(a,b) = a x b |
| 15 | Irrationality | Assume rational, derive contradiction |
| 16 | Decimal Expansions | Terminating iff denominator = 2^m x 5^n |
Real Numbers: revision sheet
Close the notes and explain each idea in your own words. Then check the formulas and attempt the examples before opening their solutions.
Recall checklist
- Why Real Numbers Matter
- Exam Approach
For each topic: state the rule, explain when it applies, give an example and identify one mistake to avoid. Return to any topic you cannot explain without looking.
Formula recap (1)
Why Real Numbers Matter
Explain your method
Write the given information, choose a method, show the steps, then check units and whether the answer makes sense.
Check worked solution 1
Check worked solution 2
Apply the concept, avoid the trap
Common mistake: Deciding whether a fraction terminates before reducing it to lowest terms.
Use this reasoning: For a reduced fraction p/q, only prime factors 2 and 5 may remain in q for a terminating decimal. Cancel common factors first.
Worked application
Without long division, decide whether 21/150 and 21/140 terminate. Explain why the denominator 140 does not force a recurring decimal.
Reveal the method and checks
- 21/150 = 7/50. Since 50 = 2 × 5², its decimal terminates; multiplying by 2/2 gives 14/100 = 0.14.
- 21/140 = 3/20 after cancelling 7. The reduced denominator is 2² × 5, so it also terminates: 3/20 = 0.15.
- The original denominator 140 contains 7, but that factor disappears on reduction. Apply the criterion to the reduced denominator.
Check your understanding
Does 13/75 terminate? Identify the decisive factor.
Check your reasoning
No. The fraction is already reduced and 75 = 3 × 5² contains a factor 3, so its decimal expansion repeats.
Turn mistakes into revision
Record the question, the step that went wrong and the corrected reason. Try it again tomorrow without the solution, then revisit it after a week. A correct guess still needs an explanation.